美国国家生物经济蓝图发布(中英文)

2012-05-02 编辑:Traveler 来源:《中国科学报》2012-05-02

 

美国国家生物经济蓝图发布

    本报讯(记者唐凤)就像Jonathan Moreno在《国家》(The Body Politic)中所写的那样,人类正在进入生物学时代。生物学越来越多地被应用于解决诸如医疗卫生、制造业、能源、农业和环境等多方面的重大挑战。从抗病毒药物能够治疗众多病毒性感染,到可再生能源,以及可以进行生物分解的塑料等产品的生产,生物技术正引导着人类社会诸多经济部门的转变。近日,美国白宫发布了“国家生物经济蓝图”,该蓝图总结了生物技术发展的紧迫趋势,并提出了未来美国政府在相关领域的5大战略性使命。

 

生物经济是建立在生物资源可持续利用、生物技术基础之上的经济,以开发生物资源为特征,其发展依赖于生物工程,涉及农业、工业、医学、环境、海洋与空间等领域。有专家预计,今后最重要的创新约有一半将来自于生物技术。

 

在生物经济席卷全球的背景下,上周,奥巴马政府宣布将加大对生物学研究的支持力度,并将生物学作为推动美国科技创新和经济发展的主要驱动者之一。同时发布的“国家生物经济”蓝图还为促进美国政府实现以生物科学研究的进步带动经济发展的目标提出了具体步骤。

 

一篇刊登在美国进步中心所属的《学科进展》上的报道指出,由于生物经济在推动经济增长和增加就业岗位等方面有巨大的潜力,美国政府将给予其行政优先权。“一个更强大的生物经济能够带来一系列好处:使美国国民更健康,活得更长久,也能够帮助国家发展更多的生物能源,减轻环境压力,还能够加快制造业的转化,提高农业部门的生产效率等。”美国科技政策办公室(OSTP)生物学研究专家Mary Maxon指出。

 

白宫发布的《国家生物经济蓝图》提出了5项战略使命,以促进生物经济可能带来的新市场和经济增长的实现:

 

1.加大生物学领域研究和开发的资金支持力度,为未来生物经济的发展奠定坚实的基础。

2.促进生物学相关成果从实验室到市场的转化,包括重点加强科学转移和管理。

3.发展和修改现有条例以减少生物经济发展的障碍,提高管理过程的可预见性,同时缩小保护环境和人类健康的成本。

4.更新培训机制,促进相关学术研究机构结盟,并激励学生积极参与国家劳动力所需要的各种培训。

5.抓住机遇,促进公私部门的伙伴关系和竞争关系的良性发展,从以往的成功或失败案例中吸取资源、知识和人才等方面的经验。

 

虽然生物经济的进步是由多方面原因促成的,但是该蓝图要求美国联邦政府机构加大对生物科学的管理和规划的力度,使其能够为美国国家需求提供更好的服务。随着人口的增长,美国社会对于健康服务,以及食品、饲料、衣物纤维、能源、化学品等物质资源的需求不断增长,Maxon提到,生物科学一旦更多关注这些国家需求的层面,将能够帮助企业生产出更多不以消耗石油和其他不可再生资源为基础的产品,满足国内需求。

 

另外,Maxon还指出,生物学与工程学、物理学、化学、计算机科学等其他学科结合后,能够具有更强大的力量,产生更多新的科学发现、产品,以及市场。

 

而评估上述5项策略产生的影响,以及利用新指标衡量其带来的生物学领域的投入、基础设施、成果等方面的变化将是美国相关部门未来工作的另一个重点,以确保“国家生物经济”蓝图的顺利实现。

 

转自《中国科学报》 (2012-05-02 A2 国际)

附原相关英文报道:

White House Releases National Bioeconomy Blueprint

Report Outlines Five Strategic Imperatives to Drive Innovation

 

By Science Progress | Thursday, April 26th, 2012

 

Editor’s Note: As Jonathan Moreno writes in The Body Politic, we are entering the century of biology. Biology is increasingly being used to solve critical challenges in not only health care, but also fields as diverse as manufacturing, energy, agriculture, and environment. From blanket anti-viral drugs able to cure any viral infection, to renewable, biodegradable plastics made by cells, to biomanufacturing of consumer goods and specialized products, biotechnology is transforming many sectors of our economy. The White House today released a long-awaited National Bioeconomy Blueprint, which summarizes emergent trends in biotechnology and contains five strategic imperatives for government policy moving forward. The White House’s summary is reprinted below, and the full report in pdf can be downloaded here.

 

Today, the Obama Administration announced its commitment to strengthening bioscience research as a major driver of American innovation and economic growth.  The National Bioeconomy Blueprint outlines steps that agencies will take to drive the bioeconomy—economic activity powered by research and innovation in the biosciences—and details ongoing efforts across the Federal government to realize this goal.

 

The bioeconomy emerged as an Administration priority because of its tremendous potential for growth and job creation as well as the many other societal benefits it offers. A more robust bioeconomy can enable Americans to live longer and healthier lives, develop new sources of bioenergy, address key environmental challenges, transform manufacturing processes, and increase the productivity and scope of the agricultural sector while generating new industries and occupational opportunities.

 

A growing U.S. population requires increased health services and more material resources including food, animal feed, fiber for clothing and housing, and sources of energy and chemicals for manufacturing. Recent advances in the biological sciences are allowing more and more of these needs to be met not with petroleum-based products and other non-renewable resources but with materials that are quite literally home-grown. Indeed, the convergence of biology with engineering and other sciences—including physics, chemistry, and computer sciences—is proving to have tremendous power to generate new scientific discoveries, new products,  new markets, and new high-skilled jobs. The benefits can be seen in every sector of the economy, from agriculture to healthcare and from energy production to environmental monitoring and stewardship. Biobased materials are also proving to be excellent and sustainable substitutes for hydrocarbon-based raw materials in a number of industrial and manufacturing processes.

 

Research is a key component, but it’s not enough to ensure a successful American bioeconomy. In the biomedical domain, public-private partnerships can help the Nation achieve the twin goals of improving health outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. Updated bioeconomy-related education and training efforts can better equip a 21st century workforce with the skills needed to succeed in an increasingly competitive global arena.

 

And unnecessary or overly burdensome regulatory barriers must be removed to accelerate the advancement of bioinventions from laboratories to marketplaces while ensuring adequate attention to environmental and health concerns that may be raised by scientists’ new facility with biological systems.

 

The Bioeconomy Blueprint outlines five strategic imperatives (objectives——by editor)for a bioeconomy with the potential to generate new markets and economic growth:

1) Support R&D investments that will provide the foundation for the future bioeconomy.
2) Facilitate the transition of bioinventions from research lab to market, including an increased focus on translational and regulatory sciences.
3) Develop and reform regulations to reduce barriers, increase the speed and predictability of regulatory processes, and reduce costs while protecting human and environmental health.
4) update training programs and align academic institution incentives with student training for national workforce needs.
5) Identify and support opportunities for the development of public-private partnerships and precompetitive collaborations—where competitors pool resources, knowledge, and expertise to learn from successes and failures.

 

Although progress is being made in all of these areas, the Blueprint calls upon Federal agencies to accelerate their efforts to harness the biological sciences for the benefit of the Nation.

 

Looking forward, it will be important to assess the impact of these efforts and apply any new metrics for measuring changes in investment, infrastructure, jobs, and more.  We will continue to collect comments on the Bioeconomy Blueprint and welcome new ideas for how we can wield America’s leadership in biological innovation toward spurring economic growth and solving critical challenges in manufacturing, energy, health, agriculture, and environment.

 

Mary Maxon is Assistant Director for Biological Research and Elizabeth Robinson is a Student Volunteer at OSTP.